Search for: "United States of America v. Page et al" Results 1 - 20 of 217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2013, 4:52 am
READ the FULL TEXT INDICTMENT United States of America v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 7:47 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
MACNEIL, et al., Defendants - Appellees, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division (District Court Docket No. 3:08-cv-507-J-33) DEATH WARRANT CASE EXECUTION SCHEDULED FOR JULY 1, 2008 REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANT Charles E. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 9:15 pm
Officer Kotter, et al (SD Ind., Judge Tinder), a 26-page opinion, Judge Kanne writes:After suffering back injuries on two occasions while incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary in Terre Haute, Indiana, Michael Jackson brought a lawsuit against employees of the prison. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 11:02 am by David Kopel
The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, et al. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 10:29 am by Sheldon Toplitt
 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)A unanimous three-member panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit last Friday in Center for International Environmental Law v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 12:59 pm by Lyle Denniston
Humanitarian Law Project et al. (08-1498), and Humanitarian Law Project et al. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
We spotted the Brief for American Historical Association et al. as Amici Curiae cited on page 4 (h/t Gautham Rao, Maggie Blackhawk). [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 5:17 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
Yes, Rosenberg, et al. have a point when they say America was slow to extend the franchise to the African population. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 1:01 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
"In their stipulation to stay the proceedings filed on October 19, the litigants both conclude that the case should be placed on hold pending the outcome of Claude Cassirer et al. v. [read post]